In fiction
Thought-capable artificial beings have appeared as storytelling devices since antiquity,[291] and have been a persistent theme in science fiction.[292]
A common trope in these works began with Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, where a human creation becomes a threat to its masters. This includes such works as Arthur C. Clarke's and Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey (both 1968), with HAL 9000, the murderous computer in charge of the Discovery One spaceship, as well as The Terminator (1984) and The Matrix (1999). In contrast, the rare loyal robots such as Gort from The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) and Bishop from Aliens (1986) are less prominent in popular culture.[293]
Isaac Asimov introduced the Three Laws of Robotics in many books and stories, most notably the "Multivac" series about a super-intelligent computer of the same name. Asimov's laws are often brought up during lay discussions of machine ethics;[294] while almost all artificial intelligence researchers are familiar with Asimov's laws through popular culture, they generally consider the laws useless for many reasons, one of which is their ambiguity.[295]
Several works use AI to force us to confront the fundamental question of what makes us human, showing us artificial beings that have the ability to feel, and thus to suffer. This appears in Karel Čapek's R.U.R., the films A.I. Artificial Intelligence and Ex Machina, as well as the novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, by Philip K. Dick. Dick considers the idea that our understanding of human subjectivity is altered by technology created with artificial intelligence.[296]
See also
- AI effect
- Artificial intelligence detection software – Software to detect AI-generated content
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare – Overview of the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare
- Behavior selection algorithm – Algorithm that selects actions for intelligent agents
- Business process automation – Technology-enabled automation of complex business processes
- Case-based reasoning – Process of solving new problems based on the solutions of similar past problems
- Emergent algorithm – Algorithm exhibiting emergent behavior
- Female gendering of AI technologies
- Glossary of artificial intelligence – List of definitions of terms and concepts commonly used in the study of artificial intelligence
- Robotic process automation – Form of business process automation technology
- Weak artificial intelligence – Form of artificial intelligence
- Wetware computer – Computer composed of organic material
Explanatory notes
- Searle presented this definition of "Strong AI" in 1999.[279] Searle's original formulation was "The appropriately programmed computer really is a mind, in the sense that computers given the right programs can be literally said to understand and have other cognitive states."[280] Strong AI is defined similarly by Russell and Norvig: "Stong AI – the assertion that machines that do so are actually thinking (as opposed to simulating thinking)."[281]
References
- Russell & Norvig (2021, p. 18)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 111–136)
- NRC (1999, pp. 200–201)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 243–252)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 52–107)
- Moravec (1988, p. 9)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 19–21)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 426–441)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 161–162, 197–203, 211, 240)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, p. 23)
- NRC (1999, pp. 210–211)
- Newquist (1994, pp. 235–248)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 115–117)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 21–22)
- NRC (1999, pp. 212–213)
- Howe (1994)
- Newquist (1994, pp. 189–201)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, p. 24)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 430–435)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 209–210)
- NRC (1999, pp. 214–216)
- Newquist (1994, pp. 301–318)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 32–33, 1020–1021)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 3–5)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 6) (constraint satisfaction)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, chpt. 2,3,7,9)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, chpt. 3,4,6,8)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 7–12)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 12–18)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 345–395)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 333–381)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 7–12)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 21)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 10)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 23–46, 69–81, 169–233, 235–277, 281–298, 319–345)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 227–243),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 17.1–17.4, 18)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §10.2 & 10.5),
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 174–177),
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 248–258),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 18.3)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §10.3),
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 281–298),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 18.2)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 335–337)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §10.4),
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 275–277)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §10.6)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 248–256, 323–335)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 335–363)
- Nilsson (1998, ~18.3.3)
- Lenat & Guha (1989, Introduction)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 113–114),
- Moravec (1988, p. 13),
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 241, 385, 982) (qualification problem)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 11),
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 16–18)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Section 11.2)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Section 11.5)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Section 16.7)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Section 22.6)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Section 16.6)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 17)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 18)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 19–22)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 397–438)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 385–542)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 3.3, 10.3, 17.5, 20)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 653) (definition)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 738–740) (cluster analysis)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 846–860) (word embedding)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §19.2) (Definition)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Chpt. 19–20) (Techniques)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 22)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 442–449)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 281)
- The Economist (2016)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 672–674)
- Jordan & Mitchell (2015)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 23–24)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 91–104)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 591–632)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 849–850)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 24)
- Cambria & White (2014)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 25)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 6)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Chpt. 3–5)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 113–163)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 79–164, 193–219)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 7–12)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 3)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §3.4)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 113–132)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 79–121)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 8)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, s§3.5)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. pp. 132–147)
- Poole & Mackworth (2017, §3.6)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 133–150)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 5)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 4)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §4.1.2)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 6–9)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 35–77)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 13–16)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 6)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 45–50)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 13)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 7)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 268–275),
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 50–62),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 15)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 10)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §7.5.2, §9.2, §9.5)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §9.3, §9.4)
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. ~46–52)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 62–73)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 4.2, 7.2)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 214, 255, 459)
- Scientific American (1999)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Chpt. 12–18 and 20),
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 345–395),
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 165–191, 333–381),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 19)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §12.5–12.6, §13.4–13.5, §14.3–14.5, §16.5, §20.2 -20.3),
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 361–381),
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. ~182–190, ≈363–379),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 19.3–4)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §13.3–13.5),
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 361–381),
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. ~363–379),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 19.4 & 7)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Chpt. 20),
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 424–433),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 20)
- Domingos (2015, p. 210)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §16.5)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Chpt. 14)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §14.3)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §14.4)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §14.5)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Chpt. 16–18),
- Poole, Mackworth & Goebel (1998, pp. 381–394)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §16.6)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 17)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 18)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, chpt. 20),
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §19.3)
- Domingos (2015, p. 88)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §19.7)
- Domingos (2015, p. 187) (k-nearest neighbor)
- Domingos (2015, p. 88) (kernel methods)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §12.6)
- Domingos (2015, p. 152)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, Chpt. 21),
- Domingos (2015, Chapter 4)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §21.2),
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 467–474),
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 3.3)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, p. 752)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §21.1)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §21.6)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 21, 22, 683, 22)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, §21.3)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, section 27.3.3)
- Christian (2020, Fairness)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 51–107)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 27–32)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 8–17)
- Moravec (1988, p. 3)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 23, 292)
- Luger & Stubblefield (2004, pp. 227–331)
- Nilsson (1998, chpt. 17.4)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 327–335, 434–435)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 145–62, 197–203)
- Newquist (1994, pp. 155–183)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 214–215)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 24, 26)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 24–26)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 486–487)
- Kurzweil (2005, p. 265)
- NRC (1999, pp. 216–222)
- Newquist (1994, pp. 189–201)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 14, 27)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, p. 26)
- Haugeland (1985, pp. 6–9)
- Crevier (1993, p. 24)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 70–71)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 2 and 984)
- Newell & Simon (1976, p. 116)
- McCorduck (2004, p. 153)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, p. 19)
- Moravec (1988, pp. 15–16)
- Minsky (1986, p. 29)
- Pinker (2007, pp. 190–91)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 120–132)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 211–239)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 981–982)
- Fearn (2007, Chpt. 3)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 421–424, 486–489)
- Crevier (1993, p. 168)
- Nilsson (1983, pp. 10–11)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, p. 24)
- Searle (1980). Searle's original presentation of the thought experiment.
- Searle (1999).
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 985)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 443–445)
- Crevier (1993, pp. 269–271)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 1000–1001)
- BBC (2006)
- Maschafilm (2010) (the film Plug & Pray)
- Russell & Norvig (2021, pp. 1004–1005)
- Omohundro (2008)
- Kurzweil (2005)
- Edward Fredkin is quoted in McCorduck (2004, p. 401)
- Butler (1863)
- Dyson (1998)
- McCorduck (2004, pp. 4–5)
No comments:
Post a Comment